The predicative нђдо 'must, have to' is ambiguous when the negative particle не precedes: не нђдо can mean either mustn't/shouldn't or don't have to, but the usual interpretation is mustn't/shouldn't.
|
The unambiguous way to express don't have to is to use a form of the verb мћчь 'can, be able to' with the particle не placed before the infinitive that accompanies it: ї могџ не писђть 'I don't have to write', вІ мћжете не писђть 'you don't have to write', etc. In these constructions the infinitives are Imperfective.
|
In a more conversational style you can omit the words in parentheses.
|
Necessity:
|
Нђдо убрђть со столђ.
|
You have to clear off the table.
|
Prohibition:
|
Не нђдо убирђть со столђ.
|
You mustn't/shouldn't clear off the table.
|
No necessity:
|
(ВІ) мћжете не убирђть со столђ.
|
You don't have to clear off the table.
|
|
Another way of expressing no necessity is to use the predicative не обязђтельно. This is a handy way to give a short answer to a нђдо-question:
|
— (Нђдо) убрђть со столђ?
|
"Do I/we have to clear off the table?"
|
— Нљт, не обязђтельно.
|
"No, you/we don't. (It's not required.)"
|
— Нљт, (тебљ) не обязђтельно убирђть.
|
"No, you don't have to clean up."
|
— Нљт, (тІ) мћжешь не убирђть.
|
"No, you don't have to clean up."
|
— Дђ, обязђтельно.
|
"Yes, you/we/someone really must."
|
|
The past tense of не нђдо is не нђдо бІло; it is just as ambiguous as не нђдо. It can mean either shouldn't have or didn't have to.
|
— (Тебљ) не нђдо бІло ітого дљлать.
|
You didn't have to do that.
|
|
or: You shouldn't have done that.
|
|